The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Andreas Norrman.

Andreas Norrman

Affiliated Researcher

Andreas Norrman.

The physical internet – review, analysis and future research agenda

Author

  • Henrik Sternberg
  • Andreas Norrman

Summary, in English

Purpose
The Physical Internet (PI) is an emerging concept that applies the Digital Internet as a design metaphor for the development of sustainable, interoperable and collaborative freight transport. With the aim of aiding researchers and policy makers in their future efforts to develop efficient logistics systems, the purpose of this paper is to present a review of the existing literature on the PI, to critically discuss the concept and to outline a research agenda.

Design/methodology/approach
The literature review investigates scientific papers, project reports, specifications and other publications related to PI. In total, 46 publications were finally analyzed. The approach used in this paper is technology adoption by firms. The authors examine the PI based on four factors: organizational readiness (technological blueprints), external pressure (promised effects), perceived benefits (business model) and adoption.

Findings
A growing number of strategies, blueprints and specifications have been developed for PI, yet there are no currently developed models that illustrate how the move from the entrenched logistics business models to the PI could ensue. There is a lack of understanding of the business models needed that can involve critical actors and promote the adoption of the PI concept.

Research limitations/implications
While using the internet as a metaphor for reimagining physical transports is certainly exciting, this review and analysis suggest that several research questions need to be addressed before further PI blueprint work is carried out.

Practical implications
The “grand challenge” of sustainability in logistics needs to be addressed and improved, but the authors’ analysis suggests that, to some extent, it is uncertain how the PI will contribute to improving sustainability, and why logistics service providers should engage in PI. Policy makers and practitioners are provided with critical issues to consider in the practical development and adoption of the concept.

Originality/value
This paper provides an outsider and technology-adoption perspective of PI research, as well as important implications for policy makers and researchers.

Department/s

  • Packaging Logistics
  • Engineering Logistics

Publishing year

2017

Language

English

Pages

736-762

Publication/Series

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management

Volume

47

Issue

8

Document type

Article

Publisher

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Topic

  • Transport Systems and Logistics

Keywords

  • Physical Internet
  • Open Logistics
  • Intelligent Cargo
  • Autonomous Logistics
  • Business Model Innovation
  • Grand challenges
  • Business model innovation
  • Grand challenge
  • Autonomous logistics
  • Intelligent Cargo
  • Open logistics
  • Physical Internet

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0960-0035